From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <dominik@uva.nl>
Subject: Re: html publish/export
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:34:06 -0700
Message-ID: <D52E3074-74F0-4619-B957-555A9FB73EAC@uva.nl>
References: <javdz8salw.fsf@richardriley.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v924)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KISsI-0003hc-0I
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:34:14 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KISsG-0003hO-FJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:34:13 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54744 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KISsG-0003hL-C9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:34:12 -0400
Received: from korteweg.uva.nl ([146.50.98.70]:39339)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <C.Dominik@uva.nl>) id 1KISsG-00067s-FT
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:34:12 -0400
In-Reply-To: <javdz8salw.fsf@richardriley.net>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Richard G Riley <rileyrgdev@googlemail.com>
Cc: org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>


On Jul 14, 2008, at 9:18 AM, Richard G Riley wrote:

>
> Is it possible for the publish functions to work without actually
> opening published files into buffers? I get a lot of buffers opening  
> and
> closing and often disappearing altogether (ie closed) after a  
> publish -
> even though I was in that file and editing it before I published. In
> addition, opening the files into "visible" buffers triggers mode
> specifics to kick in like nxhtml mode which significantly increases  
> the
> publish time. Is it necessary?

Hi Richard,

I don't the why you'd want to hand-edit a file that is automatically  
created
by the publishing process, so I don't really understand that part.

I guess we could avoid setting nxhtml mode for the created files and  
remove the buffers when publishing.

- Carsten