From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: M <Elwood151@web.de>
Subject: Re: org-log-reschedule: inactive time-stamp instead
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 22:05:42 +0200
Message-ID: <D1B22BB6.2547A%Elwood151@web.de>
References: <87k2usx9lz.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56413)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Elwood151@web.de>) id 1Z8DPG-0005KI-5G
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:05:54 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Elwood151@web.de>) id 1Z8DPB-0000hG-TN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:05:54 -0400
Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:64251)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Elwood151@web.de>) id 1Z8DPB-0000gy-Bw
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:05:49 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87k2usx9lz.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org




> Von: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
> Datum: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:20:40 +0200
> Betreff: Re: org-log-reschedule: inactive time-stamp instead
> 
> Hello,
> 
> 
>> I wonder if I get something wrong, but in the variable org-log-note-headings
>> I see
>> 
>>   Heading when rescheduling
>>   String: Rescheduled from %S on %t
>> Shouldn't the %S represent a TODO state (which makes no sense)?
> 
> %S represents the last "state". If you change a TODO keyword, is also
> a TODO keyword (or lack thereof). If you alter a timestamp, it is that
> timestamp.
> 
>> Can I replace it by an inactive timestamp?
> 
> Is there any use case for an active timestamp at this location anyway?
> If there is not, we could automatically convert it to an inactive
> timestamp.
> 
> WDYT?

Salut Nicolas,

thanks a lot for your explanations!
If the timestamp would automatically be converted to an inactive one, hat
would be perfect from my point of view.

How can we achievve that?
(I'm sorry, but I am still quite clueless concerning ELISP :-) )

Kind regards

Martin