Re: [PATCH] Testing: Add tests for `org-tags-sort-function'

[Morgan Smith <morgan.j.smith@outlook.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2442 bytes --]

I've attached an updated patch.

This one has a test where we actually don't sort tags by using the
`ignore' function.

Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:

>> +        ;; Sorting doesn't care about `org-tag-alist'.  This is only
>> +        ;; here for later when we add sorting methods that do
>> ....
>
> Then, please refrain from setting alist in this patch and add it later,
> when testing the relevant methods.

Done.  Now my tag names don't really make sense but I suppose that's not
a big issue.

>> +    (org-test-agenda-with-agenda
>> +     (string-join
>> +      '("* TODO group_a :group_a:"
>> +        "* TODO tag_a_1 :tag_a_1:"
>> +        "* TODO tag_a_2 :tag_a_2:"
>> +        "* TODO tag_b_1 :tag_b_1:"
>> +        "* TODO tag_b_2 :tag_b_2:"
>> +        "* TODO groupless :groupless:"
>> +        "* TODO lonely :lonely:")
>> +      "\n")
>> +     (dolist (org-tags-sort-function '(nil org-string< org-string>))
>> +       (should
>> +        (string-equal
>> +         (progn
>> +           (org-agenda nil "f")
>> +           (substring-no-properties (buffer-string)))
>> +         (pcase org-tags-sort-function
>> +           ;; TODO: a value of `nil' sorts it!  That's not what the
>> +           ;; customize menu of `org-tags-sort-function' says!  It
>> +           ;; says "No sorting".
>
> Right. When sort function is not set agenda specifically (but not other
> users of org-tags-sort-function) falls back to alphabetical sorting.

As far as I can tell the only place where it doesn't fall back is in
`org-set-tags'.

> In fact, the docstring does not at all mention that
> `org-tags-sort-function' is honored at all:
>
>   (defcustom org-agenda-sorting-strategy ...
>     ...
>     tag-up             Sort alphabetically by last tag, A-Z.
>     tag-down           Sort alphabetically by last tag, Z-A.
>
> We need to fix this docstring documenting `org-tags-sort-function', I think.

I don't understand what is happening in `org-entries-lessp' or how it
even manages to use `org-agenda-sorting-strategy' so I'm going to
refrain from trying to document things I don't understand.

>> +           ((or 'nil 'org-string<)
>> +            "group_a\ngroupless\nlonely\ntag_a_1\ntag_a_2\ntag_b_1\ntag_b_2\n")
>> +           ('org-string>
>> +            "tag_b_2\ntag_b_1\ntag_a_2\ntag_a_1\nlonely\ngroupless\ngroup_a\n"))))))))
>
> Nitpick: it would be more readable to use `string-join' here as well.

Done



[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-Testing-Add-tests-for-org-tags-sort-function.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2587 bytes --]

From 04fe8d44aba77b79a3a0f6ad332a0fb07bdb21a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Morgan Smith <Morgan.J.Smith@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 11:27:34 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Testing: Add tests for `org-tags-sort-function'

* testing/lisp/test-org-agenda.el (test-org-agenda/tags-sorting): New
test.
---
 testing/lisp/test-org-agenda.el | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff --git a/testing/lisp/test-org-agenda.el b/testing/lisp/test-org-agenda.el
index 778f91e8e..a06d02064 100644
--- a/testing/lisp/test-org-agenda.el
+++ b/testing/lisp/test-org-agenda.el
@@ -655,6 +655,50 @@ Sunday      7 January 2024
               (buffer-string))))))
       (org-test-agenda--kill-all-agendas))))
 
+(ert-deftest test-org-agenda/tags-sorting ()
+  "Test if `org-agenda' sorts tags according to `org-tags-sort-function'."
+  (let ((org-agenda-custom-commands
+         '(("f" "no fluff" todo ""
+            ((org-agenda-todo-keyword-format "")
+             (org-agenda-overriding-header "")
+             (org-agenda-prefix-format "")
+             (org-agenda-remove-tags t)
+             (org-agenda-sorting-strategy '(tag-up)))))))
+    (org-test-agenda-with-agenda
+     (string-join
+      '("* TODO group_a :group_a:"
+        "* TODO tag_a_1 :tag_a_1:"
+        "* TODO tag_a_2 :tag_a_2:"
+        "* TODO tag_b_1 :tag_b_1:"
+        "* TODO tag_b_2 :tag_b_2:"
+        "* TODO groupless :groupless:"
+        "* TODO lonely :lonely:")
+      "\n")
+     (dolist (org-tags-sort-function '(nil org-string< org-string> ignore))
+       (should
+        (string-equal
+         (string-trim
+          (progn
+            (org-agenda nil "f")
+            (substring-no-properties (buffer-string))))
+         (pcase org-tags-sort-function
+           ;; Not sorted
+           ('ignore
+            (string-join
+             '("group_a" "tag_a_1" "tag_a_2" "tag_b_1" "tag_b_2" "groupless" "lonely")
+             "\n"))
+           ;; TODO: a value of `nil' sorts it!  That's not what the
+           ;; customize menu of `org-tags-sort-function' says!  It
+           ;; says "No sorting".
+           ((or 'nil 'org-string< 'always)
+            (string-join
+             '("group_a" "groupless" "lonely" "tag_a_1" "tag_a_2" "tag_b_1" "tag_b_2")
+             "\n"))
+           ('org-string>
+            (string-join
+             '("tag_b_2" "tag_b_1" "tag_a_2" "tag_a_1" "lonely" "groupless" "group_a")
+             "\n")))))))))
+
 (ert-deftest test-org-agenda/goto-date ()
   "Test `org-agenda-goto-date'."
   (unwind-protect
-- 
2.45.2