From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ed Hirgelt Subject: Re: FR: source code Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 09:33:04 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87bq7w5zp0.fsf@shellarchive.co.uk> <87hchoh0tj.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v912) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JCene-0001i2-F0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:33:10 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JCenc-0001fQ-Sd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:33:09 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JCenc-0001fB-LE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:33:08 -0500 Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.186]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JCenb-00070j-NS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:33:08 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c27so456486rvf.6 for ; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 09:33:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eddward DeVilla Cc: org-mode mailing list On Jan 8, 2008, at 8:04 PM, Eddward DeVilla wrote: > On Jan 8, 2008 8:03 AM, Bastien wrote: >> BTW, we had a discussion earlier with Carsten on whether the #+BEGIN* >> directives formed a consistent class. I suggested to distinguish >> between #+BEGIN_[export_language] and #+BEGIN_[type_of_region]. I >> further suggested that we could have: >> >> #+IF_HTML / #+ENDIF_HTML >> #+IF_LaTeX / #+ENDIF_LaTeX >> #+IF_TXT / #+ENDIF_TXT >> >> and >> >> #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE / #+END_EXAMPLE >> #+BEGIN myblock >> >> But maybe we shouldn't be the strict about the semantic, at least >> not at >> the cost of simplicity. >> >> What people think? > > Being someone who uses org-mode primarily for the appearance in the > org-buffer while I'm editing and using org, I really do not like this. > It may format nicely after export, but it looks ugly in the buffer. I definite agree with that. I, too, primarily use org-mode for the way things look in Emacs. I occasionally export but my main use is within emacs. Thanks, Ed