From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: Publishing clocked time Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 05:51:45 +0200 Message-ID: References: <566e527b0909040832v2dd07dadm89168f8aaedea3d2@mail.gmail.com> <877hwabwdf.fsf@mundaneum.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MlxAv-00065F-A4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:51:53 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MlxAq-00063L-QJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:51:52 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35401 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MlxAq-00063H-Ev for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:51:48 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f211.google.com ([209.85.219.211]:56139) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlxAq-0006bM-1h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:51:48 -0400 Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so699537ewy.31 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:51:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <877hwabwdf.fsf@mundaneum.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Vauban?= Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Sep 7, 2009, at 5:35 PM, S=E9bastien Vauban wrote: > Hi Carsten, > > Carsten Dominik wrote: >> On Sep 4, 2009, at 5:32 PM, Ivan Chernetsky wrote: >>> >>> is it possible to publish clocked time of a TODO item? >> >> clocking lines are considered ugly and are therefore not included =20 >> during >> publishing. I could make an option for it... Are there more people >> interested? > > Yes, quite interested, even if not absolutely required. > > I needed that when I transferred my "billing" info to our company's > accountant, so that she was able to correctly bill the clients, and =20= > check that > I worked enough time on the month. > > However, as the LaTeX export was quite empty of those info, I =20 > switched back to > sending the info as plain text email. > > Though, would that be available, yes, I would definitely use it... No a single post in this thread does explain what exactly would be =20 useful.. :-( - Carsten