From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Tait <johngtait@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Thesaurus terms as org tags -- feature request
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:28:19 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPDE7WxqBSQ_7tB0_GffnJQpqXtve5EQv+3AA_NbS=_Bp2T+xg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60607)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <johngtait@gmail.com>) id 1QjGu0-0007Fo-5m
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:28:26 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <johngtait@gmail.com>) id 1QjGtx-000411-Na
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:28:23 -0400
Received: from mail-ew0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:61441)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <johngtait@gmail.com>) id 1QjGtx-00040f-60
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:28:21 -0400
Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so259520ewy.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:28:19 -0700 (PDT)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Achim

Let's work it through.

Let's say we have a large publishing project with lots of tags.

Some (not all) of the tags are in tag groups.

#+TAGGROUP: :characteristic: :colour:mass:material:
#+TAGGROUP: :colo(u)r: :red:green:blue:
#+TAGGROUP: :red: :crimson:scarlet:brick:

Our ungrouped tags are unrelated things like :name: and :event:.

Exporting tag :colour: would export :red: :crimson: :scarlet: :brick:
:green: and :blue:.

Would it be useful to include :characteristic:? I'd say yes, as an option.

John




Bastien <address@hidden> writes:
> #+TAGGROUP: :colour: :red:green:
>
> in such a way that:
>
> 1. searches for :red: will continue to display entries with :red:
> 2. searches for :colour: will display entries with :red: and/or :green:
>
> Would this be useful already?

If I've read the OP correctly, this should be (optionally?) transitive,
i.e. searches for :red: should also return entries with just :color:.


Regards,
Achim.