From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Ond=C5=99ej_Grover?= Subject: Re: Proposal and RFC for improving ob-python Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 08:43:33 +0100 Message-ID: References: <874mfut35p.fsf@kyleam.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141173c94a4a905265e2255 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35661) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6CwE-0007Kl-F7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 02:43:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6CwD-0003y5-Fr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 02:43:54 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::234]:34010) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6CwD-0003y1-9Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 02:43:53 -0500 Received: by lffu14 with SMTP id u14so7189440lff.1 for ; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 23:43:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <874mfut35p.fsf@kyleam.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --001a1141173c94a4a905265e2255 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, thank you all for confirming that I'm in the right place. If I felt confident enough that this would work, I wold have already presented a patch (I'm not an experienced ELisp programmer). That's why I want to discuss this approach first. Kyle, I'll be grateful for you feedback. Kind regards, Ond=C5=99ej Grover On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Kyle Meyer wrote: > Hi Ond=C5=99ej, > > Ond=C5=99ej Grover writes: > > > TL;DR for those that may have been scared off by the length of my > previous > > email: > > I propose a method of improving ob-python.el by using a progn-like eval= () > > Python function which can wrap and execute source blocks. > > > > If this list is not appropriate for discussion of improvements to > > ob-python.el, could you please give me pointers how to reach people tha= t > > might be interested in helping and discussing? > > Thanks for your proposal. This is the right place to discuss it. I've > only had the chance to briefly look at this, but I'll try to take a > closer look soon. > > -- > Kyle > --001a1141173c94a4a905265e2255 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,

thank you all for confirming tha= t I'm in the right place. If I felt confident enough that this would wo= rk, I wold have already presented a patch (I'm not an experienced ELisp= programmer). That's why I want to discuss this approach first.
Kyle, I'll be grateful for you feedback.

Kind regards,
Ond=C5=99ej Grover

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:= 27 PM, Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> wrote:
Hi Ond=C5=99ej,

Ond=C5=99ej Grover <ondrej.gr= over@gmail.com> writes:

> TL;DR for those that may have been scared off by the length of my prev= ious
> email:
> I propose a method of improving ob-python.el by using a progn-like eva= l()
> Python function which can wrap and execute source blocks.
>
> If this list is not appropriate for discussion of improvements to
> ob-python.el, could you please give me pointers how to reach people th= at
> might be interested in helping and discussing?

Thanks for your proposal.=C2=A0 This is the right place to discuss i= t.=C2=A0 I've
only had the chance to briefly look at this, but I'll try to take a
closer look soon.

--
Kyle

--001a1141173c94a4a905265e2255--