Many thanks, Nicolas !!! I've just tested. It looks good now. I should rather say it's excellent. Am Mi., 6. Okt. 2021 um 16:13 Uhr schrieb Nicolas Goaziou < mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>: > Hello, > > Elias Bounatirou writes: > > > However, it appears Nicolas' MWE unfortunately does not reproduce the > > issue. It's not the footnote that is omitted/ not exported, it's the > > citation in the footnote that is left out (when the footnote follows two > or > > more citations, of which one has a suffix). In Nicolas' MWE, there is no > > citation in the footnote. What seems to me (being no export on LaTeX) > > strange about Bruce's LaTeX output is that there is no command > > \footnote{...} or the like. So is the footnote-part of the LaTeX output > > real LaTeX? (Sorry for this naïve question.) > > I noticed my ECM was not right. It took me a while to figure out the > issue. > > > I've tested again. > > With verbose I get the same erroneous result: the citation in the > footnote > > is not rendered (using the development version of org-mode, see below): > > INPUT: > > > > [...] > > > Body text [cite: @ravlic2021; @saric2010 with a SUFFIX][fn:1] > > [...] > > > [fn:1]Test [cite: @senker1987] > > > > LaTeX OUTPUT (shortened): > > > > Body text \autocites{ravlic2021}[][with a > SUFFIX]{saric2010}\footnote{Test} > > I think I fixed it. Could you confirm it? > > Thank you. > > Regards, > -- > Nicolas Goaziou >