Re: is it possible to choose a completion engine?

[Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <paaguti@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1017 bytes --]

Tory writes:

> Org currently stands out from my workflow because it does completions its
own way, with lists and number/letter keys. It would be nice if I could
instead have the benefit of vertico, or helm, or whatever else instead. Org
would even benefit from marginalia and embark in some cases. Is there an
easy variable I'm missing to make org use completing-reads instead of the
indexing thing it does?

Hi Tory,

I'm using company-mode and I do have auto-completions without any specific
org configuration. Org is also quite well integrated with jinx as my
spellchecker. Since I mainly use org as a 'high-level' layer for
presentations and documents, I'm well served with that. And it is basically
the same I have for LaTEX and markdown.

Hope it helps,
/PA
-- 
Fragen sind nicht da, um beantwortet zu werden,
Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden
Georg Kreisler

Headaches with a Juju log:
unit-basic-16: 09:17:36 WARNING juju.worker.uniter.operation we should run
a leader-deposed hook here, but we can't yet

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1423 bytes --]