Is there some change in the status of this issue? Can one now specify the language of the result?

Cheers,

Dror

----------

Mahalo Tom,

It looks like that's what I'll be doing for the ruby block. That said, it

would be great if the :results code argument would allow a language

specification.

Greg

On Jun 27, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:

> Greg Tucker-Kellogg <address@hidden> writes:

>> I have a Ruby block that creates some dot code. I'd like to be able

>> to have the #+RESULTS block enclosed

>> in a src block that starts "#+BEGIN_SRC dot". Using :results value

>> code generates the enclosing SRC block,

>> but using the same language (Ruby) used to generate the code. Is

>> there a way to specify the coding language

>> of a generated #+RESULTS src block?

>> Thanks,

>> Greg

> Aloha Greg,

> This works for me with an emacs-lisp code block named harris-matrix that

> generates dot code.

> #+header: :var input=harris-matrix

> #+header: :file temp.pdf

> #+header: :cmdline -Tpdf

> #+header: :results output

> #+BEGIN_SRC dot

> $input

> #+END_SRC

> It's not quite what you were after, but it might help?

> All the best,

> Tom

> --

> Thomas S. Dye