Ah, that's so immensely helpful. Thank you, this will be very good to know.

On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 5:21 PM András Simonyi <andras.simonyi@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Matt,

yes, oc-csl has to extract the locator information from the suffix
because CSL processors like citeproc-el work with structured locator
data. To help this extraction, ocl-csl (similarly to citeproc-org and
I think pandoc) defines a list of locator expressions to be used in
the suffix (see the commentary of oc-csl or the citeproc-org README),
for chapter one can currently use "chap.",  "chaps." or "chapter" --
hopefully replacing the citation with
[cite:@GentilcoreTastetomatoItaly2009 chap. 4] will fix the rendering,

best regards,
András

On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 22:40, Matt Price <moptop99@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> (cc:ing Andras in case this issue maybe comes from citeproc)
>
> I'm having some trouble with suffixes in cite: links when the oc-csl exporter is enabled, e.g. with something like this:
>
> #+cite_export: csl "/home/matt/src/styles/apa.csl"
>
> this cite:
> [cite:@GentilcoreTastetomatoItaly2009 ch4]
>
> is rendered as:
>
> (ch Gentilcore, 2009, p. 4)
>
>
> on export to HTML (in a document with no print_bibliography directive).
>
> BY contrast, ob-basic gives:
>
> (Gentilcore, David, 2009 ch4)
>
> Is oc-csl doing some extra work to process suffix, or is this likely an issue with citeproc, or alternatively am I just not really understanding what ought to be happening?
>
>
> Also, are other people seeing this same issue? I don't have a testing setup that would allow me to easily run emacs -Q (given how much has to be imported) so ... well, so, my apologies for not having done that.
>
>
> THanks,
>
> Matt
>
>