Ah, that's so immensely helpful. Thank you, this will be very good to know.

On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 5:21 PM András Simonyi <andras.simonyi@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear Matt,
>
> yes, oc-csl has to extract the locator information from the suffix
> because CSL processors like citeproc-el work with structured locator
> data. To help this extraction, ocl-csl (similarly to citeproc-org and
> I think pandoc) defines a list of locator expressions to be used in
> the suffix (see the commentary of oc-csl or the citeproc-org README),
> for chapter one can currently use "chap.",  "chaps." or "chapter" --
> hopefully replacing the citation with
> [cite:@GentilcoreTastetomatoItaly2009 chap. 4] will fix the rendering,
>
> best regards,
> András
>
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 22:40, Matt Price <moptop99@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > (cc:ing Andras in case this issue maybe comes from citeproc)
> >
> > I'm having some trouble with suffixes in cite: links when the oc-csl
> exporter is enabled, e.g. with something like this:
> >
> > #+cite_export: csl "/home/matt/src/styles/apa.csl"
> >
> > this cite:
> > [cite:@GentilcoreTastetomatoItaly2009 ch4]
> >
> > is rendered as:
> >
> > (ch Gentilcore, 2009, p. 4)
> >
> >
> > on export to HTML (in a document with no print_bibliography directive).
> >
> > BY contrast, ob-basic gives:
> >
> > (Gentilcore, David, 2009 ch4)
> >
> > Is oc-csl doing some extra work to process suffix, or is this likely an
> issue with citeproc, or alternatively am I just not really understanding
> what ought to be happening?
> >
> >
> > Also, are other people seeing this same issue? I don't have a testing
> setup that would allow me to easily run emacs -Q (given how much has to be
> imported) so ... well, so, my apologies for not having done that.
> >
> >
> > THanks,
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >
>