From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Slee Subject: Org mode or Org-mode or org-mode or org? Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 09:30:38 -0400 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0117689d5fb58204e2cebca8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36460) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V4WcF-0003Lr-Hx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 09:39:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V4WcB-00080O-KX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 09:38:59 -0400 Received: from mail-oa0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c02::230]:63164) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V4WUV-0005Jp-5m for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 09:30:59 -0400 Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id f4so1490400oah.35 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:30:58 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --089e0117689d5fb58204e2cebca8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On the orgmode.org site this thing is called "Org mode" while on worg and in the papers on literate programming with org it is called "Org-mode" with a hyphen. On the email list it is commonly called "org-mode" (lower case o, hyphen) or just org. Is there any consensus about the proper name by which to refer to [oO]rg[-]mode in a formal context? Tom --089e0117689d5fb58204e2cebca8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On the orgmode.org site= this thing is called "Org mode" while on worg and in the papers = on literate programming with org it is called "Org-mode" with a h= yphen. On the email list it is commonly called "org-mode" (lower = case o, hyphen) or just org.=A0

Is there any consensus about the proper name by which to ref= er to [oO]rg[-]mode in a formal context?

Tom
=
--089e0117689d5fb58204e2cebca8--