From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Kiermeier Subject: Re: exporting documents w/ babel results w/o evaluating babel blocks Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 19:47:10 +0930 Message-ID: References: <878addc2b6b14ce99e907921f0985d24@HE1PR01MB1898.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> <87a8jkoec6.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87wpmomz6x.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <871t4wd0to.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0122efec7d7806053393de3c Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32827) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b59PL-0000QI-MH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:17:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b59PK-0007Li-J5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:17:51 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236]:36212) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b59PK-0007LM-BJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:17:50 -0400 Received: by mail-ig0-x236.google.com with SMTP id ww4so49379574igb.1 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 03:17:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Grant Rettke Cc: Nick Dokos , emacs-orgmode , "Charles C. Berry" --089e0122efec7d7806053393de3c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I second that. I like exporting everything to LaTeX without having to re-run all the code, which in many cases can add considerable time. Cheers, Andreas On 24 May 2016 at 11:04, Grant Rettke wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Charles C. Berry > wrote: > > TL;DR: Org babel headers give excellent control over what gets run, > > when it gets run, and how. Users should use them. > > Definitely! > > > Don't reset `org-export-babel-evaluate'. > > Why not? > > It can be nice to disable org-export-babel-evaluate by setting it to `nil'. > > That way you separate your workflow into two distinct steps: one for > execution and one for weaving. > > It would be fun to "see" everyone's Org-Mode workflows; I bet there > are a lot of nice approaches. > > --089e0122efec7d7806053393de3c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I second that.
= I like exporting everything to LaTeX without having to re-run all the code,= which in many cases can add considerable time.
Che= ers,
Andreas

On 24 May 2016 at 11:04, Grant Rettke <gcr@= wisdomandwonder.com> wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Charles C. Berry <ccberry@ucsd.edu> wrote:
> TL;DR: Org babel headers give excellent control over what gets run, > when it gets run, and how. Users should use them.

Definitely!

> Don't reset `org-export-babel-evaluate'.

Why not?

It can be nice to disable org-export-babel-evaluate by setting it to `nil&#= 39;.

That way you separate your workflow into two distinct steps: one for
execution and one for weaving.

It would be fun to "see" everyone's Org-Mode workflows; I bet= there
are a lot of nice approaches.


--089e0122efec7d7806053393de3c--