From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark Edgington <edgimar@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Export: Override headline numbering via properties
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 06:11:34 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMsBe8qAS52NyHQjqMA9Ypk6U4XRaLaL3SJy1=9mb4toEZZD2A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMsBe8qCd55NO8f92Z=hO_Z5_1N1Mgd6t3GVXEt3cscX0tzdtA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87ppwvtnbw.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42025)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <edgimar@gmail.com>) id 1UbpjY-0000Aa-20
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 06:11:57 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <edgimar@gmail.com>) id 1UbpjX-0003lj-1O
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 06:11:56 -0400
Received: from mail-ob0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::231]:36391)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <edgimar@gmail.com>) id 1UbpjW-0003lZ-Sc
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2013 06:11:54 -0400
Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id uz6so1412449obc.22
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 13 May 2013 03:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87ppwvtnbw.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Also, I forgot to mention that the patch is tested, and behaves as expected.

On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your patch.
>
> Though, I don't get what you are trying to achieve nor what a use case
> would be. Have you tested this patch ? It may not behave as you expect
> it to.