From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id sDC+HwrPx2WmSgAAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 20:31:22 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id sDC+HwrPx2WmSgAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 20:31:22 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=verilab.com header.s=v202012 header.b=ePgo0DvK; dkim=pass header.d=verilab.com header.s=gv202012 header.b=PUmsCLtb; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=verilab.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1707593482; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=y6P/Ijns9rOGDGYmp4gmhThuwZh7cjiPDnjTSdHaVSY=; b=friA6lP/vOGl5HtSfVH+T/DJDyNH2KSWu2+90K6B9Ak5KpqlIM1sVwKNL1N9kGjtDYFIa0 esk+xHNOo1pdAhvkTzR0PDIbYYCiV2ZMUtzGGrBTVRlddECYVMyh6RV2pMaOZJY0KdR1oR BU0AawK9Zx2GiYa1ZpqUvTermPAM8rvdcRoYKOrS2Q/fKg7tyqalUSI8dSsRvopyRzongG 4dMFVKudhf16zWhSy1O2/JMNHxsDMMEcu9smpnE0qq3ZUJXv6rRLWehiQ8OzxsU9ghPAl+ fyHnp4LUTA0JlLycLFj9BHMV7nVgWf1yWxAEu8KsW7PpHp/v/JLKXdYQ0Vm6RA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=verilab.com header.s=v202012 header.b=ePgo0DvK; dkim=pass header.d=verilab.com header.s=gv202012 header.b=PUmsCLtb; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=verilab.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1707593482; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=CtSQKVO1QvsshAlZ3RDL7kt1XgQPYMv4CL2foNpCDvVFa66yecdx9y64M3ozYK/LwIQZw2 zN/s9bw/9PAAMgwjzkrqsYLEvbxVvR01KOv9g/PNcpAC8RlFiQjp5isK6lTXNu+ll+2B5A fuT1mf+SJas0iWuWCHcWFi9UyMDobJGNfxj/lNzj1lGm1x95W3E46yg8qAKwiCuiO5pKth vGfdpDM3s9tFE3zxstYO1MIRUG/D7hAER2dUYwS4A0qyFmMq4z7fINJk7evYAASiqA8tzs PClIwhnzeeIWQPgGhV4o6mvWGw4ElWmadqP+kjKAoeixRP684qSubL3qozFCbQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23F106749B for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 20:31:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rYt3R-0000oD-Vu; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:30:26 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rYt3P-0000nu-Ac for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:30:23 -0500 Received: from cather.verilab.com ([64.20.234.125]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rYt3L-00083b-57 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:30:22 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=verilab.com; s=v202012; t=1707593414; bh=y6P/Ijns9rOGDGYmp4gmhThuwZh7cjiPDnjTSdHaVSY=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To; b=ePgo0DvKEFzhGOAqS2RP/7FGSVX1XzXE3ld7OSueRAjEG/FLRjN3PUEJsFJgjcwOy AINEur6ZZH+FLn4HhKCwKRuQnuVphrXrwFywvePvbhd8UYiIXTuqehzHR7HzcASipS 2JIIOAie+xdexCOeMvoDp+4Ud5iKXUf726RouqcWzLnQGx9XoVCi//WlGwiyDrDvvq 8WSuoIEJl82pgGsgG3uSm3S4JEpUAv2Zb00RsDvKEeYUNj/jZ5RHa1ce1XdukBYl++ qbOXRgJs1wPWVZM8ntTUgcvV7EKFyKeyaq4b1Sr01qTRJ1/p/MSkYo6bzvDmY/wMeL xgfAQulkquyCg== Received: from mail-lj1-f200.google.com (mail-lj1-f200.google.com [209.85.208.200]) by cather.verilab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C6AB21613 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 19:30:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-f200.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2d09cf0adc1so19320511fa.0 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 11:30:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=verilab.com; s=gv202012; t=1707593412; x=1708198212; darn=gnu.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=y6P/Ijns9rOGDGYmp4gmhThuwZh7cjiPDnjTSdHaVSY=; b=PUmsCLtbkRK4IhQo+ryzapQj/tyL3fc3fihEJYxmATNt0tYj+gCJaoNYNnV98wF6pv uRahr0lixexZjxNLB4ferYHN5705if2vFFvknRj1cnJGDHB7gc2hJYRKznK651WYjmLe Y0mZoh/mTEdMgE4+f/HpiBmKXlu+H/vAytIzyRO7k6ASSN2c84RWq/F2D9sqsRakJYkR pesf4K86eVCUZR49BQgtgtujp1JBXcBhDopJYiWn5vULQrUosvM2XUKOk3TyQE66YM+0 qxoH3P9GGCqkueAyWoybA3fPr4yNZ9YAffreZktjrlEDt0XGOZUPVd1gJu2P9EzR5d5s Ro7g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1707593412; x=1708198212; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=y6P/Ijns9rOGDGYmp4gmhThuwZh7cjiPDnjTSdHaVSY=; b=XYsxupBovZVTHbKGmDLFn1UkT1HeoI39lktUfGu+84V3eLk0QdWg+y/gu50Vzt1DUV IC/nvnl+5QG/uYZDImhQ51bcyEd33eJgCOLry2MSxk2lgoflvtCREDAnvUHJM7KEPNSZ b/Y3Juvu6dTyBPTBeukOeROa6Gg8TSpeQu6kdxU5MzPHtRlpPOrqmh2ss8YBMape5iK6 /m04dOCu1jm8M+H55ebA+cgKYSCM1as2jptNhPP16OT5Mdad6WG9j007pJ+XXaUcwGEy kUhftA8SqL9XY3TNf6WUSrrZC1Mo1nPWny8VIaPdEGTEmlHr0Gy2eHkK/bnTwEzv1vHA 9ZSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzQaWoYAtPI7Pmq2I8S9BzaLuyIrA5lcUXDhT8L6TzQyDzjxxpQ g9w5S7zHwco4QoOC6yrCB+JwxhW/MBM5TNqd5Af0kh1cSgeOnXhOAbmqnhNzlcMYr/LSkdq+T9m hhWy12MPF/Z102ZhgWMbcuResKFwAmYkFZ8g3DUxKx1ShlXYTeOsnDMWHJ1dzBICFyXNwuRdiT3 Gy2T7NgXT1UQXsUYg9kxQVRUg8mALixmlAzQdIPh9x X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8847:0:b0:2d0:d75e:54e7 with SMTP id z7-20020a2e8847000000b002d0d75e54e7mr1592230ljj.17.1707593412089; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 11:30:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEqEi2bCXuG4/VkpPGs0THcaVXgKulYGQDeuLxGgzsPq9j6XMlWT09H1UqFmYnKnRjwnCCHh3R+CuSgR2KYqYc= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8847:0:b0:2d0:d75e:54e7 with SMTP id z7-20020a2e8847000000b002d0d75e54e7mr1592216ljj.17.1707593411534; Sat, 10 Feb 2024 11:30:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87zfwccpvs.fsf@gmail.com> <87h6ik49eb.fsf@localhost> <87a5o99xn5.fsf@localhost> In-Reply-To: <87a5o99xn5.fsf@localhost> From: Tommy Kelly Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 13:29:35 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [BUG] Invalid capture datetree capture templates (newly introduced) [9.7-pre (release_9.6.18-1145-g10d286 @ /home/jds6696/.emacs.d/straight/build/org/)] To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.20.234.125; envelope-from=tommy.kelly@verilab.com; helo=cather.verilab.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.31 X-Spam-Score: -6.31 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 23F106749B X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-TUID: nM085zYaKNhz In response to Tommy Kelly writing: >> ...if there is already one or more datetrees anywhere in [a] file AT A LEVEL >> BELOW THAT specified by [a datetree-based capture] template [then] the >> position specified by the template is simply ignored. Ihor Radchenko wrote: > Are you sure that what you describe is newly introduced? > I'd expect this exact behavior since forever, judging from how > `org-datetree--find-create' is implemented. No, I'm not sure. In fact, now you mention it, what you're suggesting probably is the case. This is the first time I've tried using more than one datetree in the same file, so I wouldn't before have noticed the behavior I describe. That said, had I noticed it in the past, I would have been inclined to flag it as an issue. At very least it makes the documentation incorrect, but in fact I'd say that the documentation is fine and the behavior is wrong. Nevertheless, it's not connected with the issue you already fixed (https://list.orgmode.org/878r3xfm90.fsf@localhost/T/#t) so that should remain closed. thx.