Hi Zororg,

I would be happy to work with you on this if you're interested in
collaborating on it. I'm a little concerned with the scope, given that Ihor
said: "We should probably fix handling indirect buffers across Org mode".
I'm not sure how extensive indirect buffer handling is across Org, or if
it's even consistent across Org right now. I'll probably need some help
from people more familiar with it to figure out a starting point, but I'm
excited to take a look :)

Cheers,

Derek

On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 3:02 AM Dilip <zororg@tilde.green> wrote:

>
> > (looking for good first issues to tackle)
> Since you said this, I'd like to point to my own issue that I raised.
> Even I have not tried to solve to debug the issue (which is bad on my
> part)
>
> https://list.orgmode.org/87y15bcbi1.fsf@localhost/
>
> Even I have been a lurker here, just falling into the rabbit hole of
> emacs and orgmode.
>
> I should find myself some motivation to sit and solve issues and make
> contributions.
>
> The "future of Org" was definitely inspiring and fulfilling to re-think
> org development for future ahead.
>
>
> https://list.orgmode.org/8734iwel1o.fsf@localhost/T/#u
>
> Also to remind tomorrow (11th Dec, 19:00 EST -- Turkey) there will be
> OrgMeetup. It would be a great place to have more live discussions with
> everyone.
> Better to make sure to it attend as well.
>
> --
> Best,
> Zororg
>


-- 
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| Derek Chen-Becker                                             |
| GPG Key available at https://keybase.io/dchenbecker and       |
| https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=derek%40chen-becker.org |
| Fngrprnt: EB8A 6480 F0A3 C8EB C1E7  7F42 AFC5 AFEE 96E4 6ACC  |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+