I'm still sorting out the copyright assignment, but I have another style question: It feels like I should move the `should' clauses closer to the checks so that I get a more concise report when something is wrong: (ert-deftest test-org-base-buffer-file-name () "Test `org-base-buffer-file-name'." ;; Test direct buffer resolution (org-test-with-temp-text-in-file "File" (let ((base-filename (buffer-file-name))) ;; Confirm that we get the same answer whether we provide the buffer or use the default (should (equal base-filename (org-base-buffer-file-name))) (should (equal base-filename (org-base-buffer-file-name (current-buffer)))))) ;; Test indirect buffer resolution (org-test-with-temp-text-in-file "File with indirect buffer" (let ((base-filename (buffer-file-name)) (base-buffer (current-buffer)) (indirect-test-buffer (make-indirect-buffer (current-buffer) "test"))) (set-buffer indirect-test-buffer) ;; Confirm that we get the same answer for the default, the indirect buffer, and the base buffer (should (equal base-filename (org-base-buffer-file-name))) (should (equal base-filename (org-base-buffer-file-name base-buffer))) (should (equal base-filename (org-base-buffer-file-name indirect-test-buffer))) (kill-buffer indirect-test-buffer))) ;; Test for a buffer with no associated file (org-test-with-temp-text "Buffer without file" (should-not (org-base-buffer-file-name)))) Is that OK? Thanks, Derek On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 12:13 PM Ihor Radchenko wrote: > Derek Chen-Becker writes: > > >> The latest version of your patch exceeds 20LOC and cannot be accepted > >> unless you have FSF copyright assignment. > > > > Sorry, that was clear in your previous comment. I am working on the > > assignment form right now but I expect that to be a solved problem and I > > want to continue to contribute to Org mode anyway, so I wanted to > > parallelize that with continuing on the patch. If you would like me to > stop > > working on the patch until I have the copyright assignment taken care > of, I > > can do that, too. > > Great. If you are going to have the copyright assignment, there is no > limit on the patch size. It is just that we will need to wait until you > finalize the assignment before we actually merge it. > > But nothing stops you and me from working on the patch before that. > > >> I recommend using `org-babel-effective-tangled-filename' instead. > >> This is more future-proof against possible changes in the way file name > >> is computed. > >> > > > > I'm sorry, I don't quite understand. Do you mean I should change the > > function name `org-base-buffer-file-name' to > > `org-babel-effective-tangled-filename' or something else? > > Ouch. Never mind. I misread your patch. I thought that you are using > :tangle yes in which case `org-babel-effective-tangle-filename' would be > used to auto-generate the tangle file name. But that's not the case - > you explicitly specify the tangle target. > > -- > Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, > Org mode maintainer, > Learn more about Org mode at . > Support Org development at , > or support my work at > -- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | Derek Chen-Becker | | GPG Key available at https://keybase.io/dchenbecker and | | https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=derek%40chen-becker.org | | Fngrprnt: EB8A 6480 F0A3 C8EB C1E7 7F42 AFC5 AFEE 96E4 6ACC | +---------------------------------------------------------------+