From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alexander Corvinus <acrvns@gmail.com>
Subject: Why functions like org-show-subtree are undocumented?
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:27:37 +0300
Message-ID: <CAMbC+T83GNHqZGAvTHd-4U2K8bymPJp2rmdNt2hoiozSZ9i=aw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0443066438011304b734828d
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52696)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <acrvns@gmail.com>) id 1RpMkD-00046P-7b
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:27:49 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <acrvns@gmail.com>) id 1RpMk7-0001dH-MT
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:27:45 -0500
Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]:50511)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <acrvns@gmail.com>) id 1RpMk7-0001dC-Gq
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:27:39 -0500
Received: by wicr5 with SMTP id r5so2911891wic.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:27:37 -0800 (PST)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

--f46d0443066438011304b734828d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi all,

I just reviewed code in org.el and noticed that function org-show-subtree,
which is called by org-cycle, unconditionally shows whole subtree (exactly
what I wanted to have in my shortcuts!).

So the question is - why such useful functions like org-show-subtree,
hide-subtree, show-children aren't documented in manual? Because of that,
previously I thought that what I wanted was impossible (without source
change).

Thanks

--f46d0443066438011304b734828d
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,<br><br>I just reviewed code in org.el and noticed that function org=
-show-subtree, which is called by org-cycle, unconditionally shows whole su=
btree (exactly what I wanted to have in my shortcuts!).<br><br>So the quest=
ion is - why such useful functions like org-show-subtree, hide-subtree, sho=
w-children aren&#39;t documented in manual? Because of that, previously I t=
hought that what I wanted was impossible (without source change).<br>
<br>Thanks<br>

--f46d0443066438011304b734828d--