From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: suvayu ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: plus in superscript.
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:29:29 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMXnza3ZP1b9S+HQdmkmgpjUqn0Ggik5VJTMjAQ95HeekejbYQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <x.piter@gmail.com>
	<CAKMLjj6k47VNevn-pZ59_hRGKuD1i=LXA4pwaw+8Tu_UAgWYZw@mail.gmail.com>
	<18354.1316019331@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58485)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu@gmail.com>) id 1R3xxn-0003ob-32
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 18:29:51 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu@gmail.com>) id 1R3xxm-0001JP-9R
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 18:29:51 -0400
Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:62908)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu@gmail.com>) id 1R3xxm-0001JC-4Z
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 18:29:50 -0400
Received: by bkbzs2 with SMTP id zs2so2231590bkb.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <18354.1316019331@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Piter_ <x.piter@gmail.com>

Hi Nick,

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> wrote:
> * This is a test: \(T^{+}\)

Apart from what Christian said, do you have any comments about $..$
and \(..\) ? I hear conflicting arguments about which is preferred
(e.g. $..$ is a TeX construct where as \(..\) is a LaTeX macro arguing
in favour of $..$). Specially an opinion in the context of org ->
latex export would be interesting to hear.

-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.