From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: suvayu ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Suggested change to Manual 3.5.9 example table
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 00:38:58 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMXnza3-Y+gN9d7qSyFHGPoqmWCU4zddJFA4fXuc0sL+BJXtfw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4FFD89AD.1030707@verizon.net>
	<CAMXnza0Ti-xzL5LjK5D-6rZ8OVaKW-BN8dcrx0SZzf8QGaW9OQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FFDFCD6.8040305@verizon.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43647)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu@gmail.com>) id 1Sp5Z2-0004G4-3W
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 18:39:20 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu@gmail.com>) id 1Sp5Z1-0005Kv-75
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 18:39:20 -0400
Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:56006)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu@gmail.com>) id 1Sp5Z1-0005Kq-1E
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 18:39:19 -0400
Received: by obhx4 with SMTP id x4so2660473obh.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4FFDFCD6.8040305@verizon.net>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Charles <millarc@verizon.net>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello Charles,

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Charles <millarc@verizon.net> wrote:
> All I was trying to say that example should be corrected since it is
> confusing.

And here I was thinking you are asking about the format specifier! :-p

Since you have already put in the effort to correct the table, how about
submitting it as a patch to doc/org.texi? You could also take this
opportunity to improve the text somewhat. :)

Cheers,

-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.