From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: suvayu ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Unicode and Latex export
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 10:42:49 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMXnza0Ofy=NscoRntPJZ7ZH0woURTgH40c=6iMfnKszwvjBLQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMXnza1CCRzqwoTkeUxFrsKDvO1Wf98MjCARv3SCe6pZTGU8Tw@mail.gmail.com>
	<80zkjke8h5.fsf@somewhere.org> <m1bow09w4v.fsf@nobis-it.eu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55428)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu@gmail.com>) id 1QqLQW-0001vY-Iv
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 04:43:14 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu@gmail.com>) id 1QqLQU-0003s9-VI
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 04:43:12 -0400
Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:64471)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu@gmail.com>) id 1QqLQU-0003s5-It
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 04:43:10 -0400
Received: by fxg9 with SMTP id 9so4439242fxg.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 01:43:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m1bow09w4v.fsf@nobis-it.eu>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Stefan Nobis <stefan-ml@snobis.de>
Cc: org-mode mailing list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi Stefan,

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Stefan Nobis <stefan-ml@snobis.de> wrote:
> For proper Unicode support its preferable to use LuaTeX
> or XeTeX rather than using ucs

Thanks for the warning. :)

-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.