From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Stansell Subject: Re: using gnuplot's "splot" and "every" commands on org-mode table data Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 18:16:40 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87k3ncxeqt.fsf@gmail.com> <871u9isl4x.fsf@gmail.com> <87sj1xocz7.fsf@gmail.com> <87ehdapncr.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwrtk5xa.fsf@gmail.com> <87li7dibmt.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35397) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VFSJQ-0002d5-JV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 13:16:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VFSJN-0005MU-PK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 13:16:44 -0400 Received: from mail-vc0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22a]:49683) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VFSJN-0005ML-HW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 13:16:41 -0400 Received: by mail-vc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id kw10so1549476vcb.1 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:16:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Schulte Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Dear Eric, Recently you made some nice changes to the way gnuplot plots surface data from org tables. Your changes are present on git://orgmode.org/org-mode.git, but I switched to using ELPA recently and I've just noticed that your changes are not yet present on http://orgmode.org/elpa/. Do you know if it's just because the latter lags the former by 3 months or more? As far as I can tell, I'm using the following versions: From git: org-version: 8.0.7 (release_8.0.7-406-g4b7490) From ELPA: Org-mode version 8.0.7 (8.0.7-7-g9e5104-elpa (org-20130826) Kind regards, Paul On 17 May 2013 22:33, Paul Stansell wrote: > Hi Eric, > > That's seems perfect now; I can't see any other issues. Thanks! > > Kind regards, > > Paul