From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Satoru KURASHIKI <lurdan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Two ob-lua versions
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 10:28:12 +0900
Message-ID: <CAM0xXk8Cw-y+UtB7XUhB3n6bmdfh-2O3YNKqBc03rxf48aY=tA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87eflsduo9.fsf@dell-desktop.WORKGROUP>
	<877erjdgom.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32881)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lurdan@gmail.com>) id 1ellrs-0001Yb-75
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 20:28:17 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lurdan@gmail.com>) id 1ellrq-00023i-JK
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 20:28:15 -0500
Received: from mail-yw0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22d]:41016)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <lurdan@gmail.com>) id 1ellrq-00022r-Du
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 20:28:14 -0500
Received: by mail-yw0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id f12so4894072ywb.8
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 17:28:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <877erjdgom.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: emacs-org list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

hi,

On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 6:22 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thibault Marin <thibault.marin@gmx.com> writes:
>
>> I noticed that a recent change added an ob-lua.el file to contrib/lisp/.
>> Since there is already an ob-lua.el in lisp/, I was wondering if the new
>> version was adding functionality not supported by the one in lisp/ (it
>> does not seem to be the case on casual inspection) and if so, whether
>> they could/should be merged.
>
> I just realized that, too. It seems wrong. I'm Cc'ing stardiviner so we
> can have some insight about it.

Anyway this breaks installation with package.el in org-plus-contrib case.
because of conflicting "ob-lua.el" filename.

> stardiviner, would you mind explaining why you need to create an
> "ob-lua.el" library in "contrib/" ?

It has to be fixed, so please revert that merge, until stardiviner will notice
this thread and retry PR...

regards,
-- 
KURASHIKI Satoru