From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Starting emacs followed directly by org-agenda search and
 visiting file removes color formatting
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 12:16:56 +0200
Message-ID: <CALn3zoiscomt98p=CEg8=18nOSW6FT992JmwUiRdOReZtzf4MQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+M2ft-=HDK_ZOvhremWRWdeViVr18Ngypmp-9NK+ygWj_JjuQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+M2ft-jRFvqP=fpfCmAB-BXnFvEOJ3-VyzO-xeb_sPQK5Zqzw@mail.gmail.com>
	<86fvxgkc4c.fsf@somewhere.org> <874ndwfx4z.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<519CC1CF.3060908@online.de> <519CDE8A.5060604@online.de>
	<87ip2aw2of.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <864nduawg2.fsf@somewhere.org>
	<CALn3zojEFt8PLRu57Y7+4BExjp3BLN=5G0pktNcCUaBybE1QUg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87ip2ahuwq.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42978)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>) id 1UfSZz-0005mf-Og
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 06:17:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>) id 1UfSZu-0000Ph-Js
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 06:17:03 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87ip2ahuwq.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi Bastien

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> wrote:
> Does it make a difference whether the file has a #+setupfile
> directive or not?

The issue disappears when I remove #+setupfile as I "expected". Sorry,
I forgot to mention that the
(when (search-forward "#+setupfile" nil t)
looked suspicious to me when I looked at the commit.

Michael