From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Brand Subject: Re: Link "bracket-types" Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 16:29:55 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87a7t8q64z.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87603vr86w.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87mux7prcw.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60380) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fGmZx-0007I4-TQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2018 10:29:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fGmZw-0005W6-Q7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2018 10:29:57 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22a]:44752) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fGmZw-0005W0-Kr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 May 2018 10:29:56 -0400 Received: by mail-qt0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id d3-v6so2767700qtp.11 for ; Thu, 10 May 2018 07:29:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87mux7prcw.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Org Mode Hi Nicolas On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:33 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Sorry for being dense, but I still don't get it. I can not claim to have been clear enough, hope to make it clearer below. > When using non-Org tools, the solution doesn't belong to Org, does it? > I mean, we are talking about fontification in Emacs Org mode. Tweaking > it will not change the output of these other tools. Agreed. > This is probably obvious to you, but again, this is a genuine question: > how would you use /in Org/ the information about the brackets > surrounding the link? A concrete example would probably help. Only when I can see the brackets of case 3 in Org rendered as : [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filter]] I know that I can change it to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filter for a cleaner view in non-Org tools. For case 1 I still prefer to see only the link description because I prefer to hide a too disturbing URL part most of the times. My example for case 1 is only artificial and my actual descriptions will be such that it can not be confused with case 2. I hope the previously described idea of a third value for org-descriptive-links or something similar makes some sense. Michael