From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Brand Subject: Re: link interfering with brackets when abbreviated Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:22:07 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87ppm9sxoh.fsf@gmail.com> <87lhwxswby.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36116) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIhFI-0006Mj-RP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:22:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIhFH-0003aN-UP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:22:08 -0500 Received: from mail-qc0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c01::236]:55911) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIhFH-0003a9-Pu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:22:07 -0500 Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id w7so1638107qcr.41 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:22:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87lhwxswby.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Org Mode Hi Nicolas On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > I don't understand. Using C-c C-o on "1" "2" or "3" will not open any > link since point is not on a link anyway. So you will consistently get > "No link found". Aha, now as I see that you removed the following from the docstring of org-open-at-point I start to get it: If there is no link at point, this function will search forward up to the end of the current line. Before I found it _very_ useful that after I navigated to the right line at last, I didn't have to navigate further within this line. That the position of point within a line with an Org list item matters for structure editing I can follow. But for org-open-at-point I do not yet understand this requirement. What is the benefit of removing the search on the same line? Michael