From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: No dot in datepicker dialog
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:43:31 +0200
Message-ID: <CALn3zogYSvGfDqLKbq6_YJeRxBB5Lk6PkPcYLYqCgTqU-FEwUw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2013-03-26T20-43-10@devnull.Karl-Voit.at>
	<87hajm1mpa.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20130404141946.GE16563@boo.workgroup>
	<CALn3zohFzW=-oOFwCzDeJf1roq5xGzCoHua+pcyePYN55XL=Sg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87zjwo2w0a.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<846C2072-E035-4403-BD96-FDC72999FC61@gmail.com>
	<87ppxke3cy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43145)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>) id 1UUvIc-0003bB-NH
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 04:43:36 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>) id 1UUvIa-0000qz-TU
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 04:43:34 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87ppxke3cy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> wrote:
> Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
> [...]
>> How about testing for
>>
>>    (= (point) (1+ (length prompt)))
>>
>> instead of
>>
>>    (= (char-before) 32)
>>
>> ?
>>
>> - Carsten
>
> Yep, as you wish -- I though it was somehow nice to still be able to
> quickly jump at todays date by inserting a space then hitting ".",
> even in the middle of the inserted text... but clearly a dubious
> trick.
>
> Let me know if you want me to do the change,

(= (point) (1+ (length prompt))) would be a regression of "3 1 . 1 2 .".

On the other side the current (= (char-before) ?.) does still not echo
the "." at the beginning which I found convenient but don't insist if
there is a reason for not to echo.

Michael