From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Brand Subject: Re: org-meta-return Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 21:43:14 +0100 Message-ID: References: <5387.1361401155@alphaville> <5951.1361405498@alphaville> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec554d9844d20b504d6f72ca9 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59502) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UBtH4-0001Dx-Bl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 15:43:19 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UBtH3-0007cH-4H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 15:43:18 -0500 Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com ([209.85.217.173]:36294) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UBtH2-0007bk-Sx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 15:43:17 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id gf7so3025640lbb.4 for ; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 12:43:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: 42 147 Cc: Org Mode --bcaec554d9844d20b504d6f72ca9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi John On Feb 21, 2013 10:16 PM, "42 147" wrote: > [continues off-topic] > > > Have you tried a Dvorak keyboard? > > A friend of mine ridicules me for being a QWERTY typist, but I have found > no empirical evidence that it is actually superior. At best, it has been > proven, in /some/ studies, to be /slightly/ superior; and from a > cost-benefit standpoint, /slight/ superiority according to /some/ studies > (and I should add, only at extreme speeds), is not worth relearning how to > type. Colemak is a much better keyboard layout than Dvorak. I have been using Colemak for many years now with great pleasure. Michael --bcaec554d9844d20b504d6f72ca9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi John

On Feb 21, 2013 10:16 PM, "42 147" <aeuster@gmail.com> wrote:
> [continues off-topic]
>
> > Have you tried a Dvorak keyboard?
>
> A friend of mine ridicules me for being a QWERTY typist, but I have found
> no empirical evidence that it is actually superior. At best, it has been
> proven, in /some/ studies, to be /slightly/ superior; and from a
> cost-benefit standpoint, /slight/ superiority according to /some/ studies
> (and I should add, only at extreme speeds), is not worth relearning how to
> type.

Colemak is a much better keyboard layout than Dvorak. I have been using Colemak for many years now with great pleasure.

Michael

--bcaec554d9844d20b504d6f72ca9--