From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Brand Subject: Re: Orgtbl: edit table like code, in a separate buffer? Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 21:59:23 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46365) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acflt-0000Fe-BZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 15:59:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acfls-0004Aj-Dl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 15:59:25 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]:37122) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acfls-0004AY-6c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 15:59:24 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id p65so49428645wmp.0 for ; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 12:59:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rafael Ramirez Morales Cc: Org Mode Hi Rafael On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Rafael Ramirez Morales wrote: > I was wondering if it was technically possible to invoke a separate buffer > to edit a table in org mode. > > My working scenario is a table with several columns with limited width so as > to edit a buffer with org-startup-indented on. I would like to achieve > something like what is done with source blocks: upon invoking a command, the > table would open in a separate buffer, with indent (i.e. visual > line-wrapping) option off and that ignores column width limits. > > Is there any way to achieve this? Not in the way that you describe. As a workaround you could temporarily remove the narrowing cookies <10>. Take care of not breaking a TBLFM when moving a whole row with all cookies out of the table, in this case e. g. keep an empty row. > Is there another way to go about this problem? There is "C-u C-u C-c `" (`org-table-edit-field') to fully view and optionally edit field by field one field at a time in a separate window described in (info "(org) Built-in table editor"). Michael