From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: No dot in datepicker dialog
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:52:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CALn3zog57kgnuLBsrY6kPw+1CvYTT8kzKQakedFoZJOnK69AYA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2013-03-26T20-43-10@devnull.Karl-Voit.at>
	<87hajm1mpa.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20130404141946.GE16563@boo.workgroup>
	<CALn3zohFzW=-oOFwCzDeJf1roq5xGzCoHua+pcyePYN55XL=Sg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87zjwo2w0a.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<846C2072-E035-4403-BD96-FDC72999FC61@gmail.com>
	<87ppxke3cy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<CALn3zogYSvGfDqLKbq6_YJeRxBB5Lk6PkPcYLYqCgTqU-FEwUw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45106)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>) id 1UUvQv-00076F-U0
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 04:52:11 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>) id 1UUvQu-0003t9-7x
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 04:52:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CALn3zogYSvGfDqLKbq6_YJeRxBB5Lk6PkPcYLYqCgTqU-FEwUw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Michael Brand
<michael.ch.brand@gmail.com> wrote:
> (= (point) (1+ (length prompt))) would be a regression of "3 1 . 1 2 .".

Sorry, it is not a regression when reloading lisp properly and not
only with eval-buffer of org.el. Would be ok for me if not echoing "."
at the beginning is intended.

Michael