Re: #+CALL get the first row of output table lost when using latex export

[<iemacs@gmail.com>]

Thank you, Charles.  And =:colnames yes= does work here.  But the
results are the same when I evaluate t1 and t2 with
`org-babel-execute-maybe'.

When I take another try, new problem seems to occur.

The test file is:
#+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
#+NAME: t1
#+BEGIN_SRC python :exports results
  return [['A'],None,[2],None,[3]]
#+END_SRC

#+CAPTION: T1
#+RESULTS: t1

#+NAME: t2
#+CALL: t1() :exports results

#+CAPTION: T2
#+RESULTS: t2
#+END_EXAMPLE

The results of `org-babel-execute-maybe' on t1 and t2 are identical:
#+BEGIN_SRC org
  | A |
  |---|
  | 2 |
  |---|
  | 3 |
#+END_SRC

The relevant part of the latex output is:
#+BEGIN_SRC latex
  \begin{table}[htb]
  \caption{T1}
  \centering
  \begin{tabular}{r}
  A\\
  \hline
  2\\
  \hline
  3\\
  \end{tabular}
  \end{table}

  \begin{table}[htb]
  \caption{T2}
  \centering
  \begin{tabular}{r}
  A\\
  2\\
  3\\
  \end{tabular}
  \end{table}
#+END_SRC

Both \hlines in Table T2 are missing.



Kind regards,

Tian Qiu


On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Charles Berry <ccberry@ucsd.edu> wrote:
>  <iemacs <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I encounter a problem when I use #+CALL to create a table with latex
>> export.  The problem is that the first row of the table is missing, if
>> the table is created with #+CALL.
>>
> [deleted - setup info]
>
>> The minimal table example is
>>
>> #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
>> #+NAME: t1
>> #+BEGIN_SRC python :exports results
>>   return [['A'],None,[2]]
>> #+END_SRC
>>
>> #+CAPTION: T1
>> #+RESULTS: t1
>>
>> #+NAME: t2
>> #+CALL: t1() :exports results
>>
>> #+CAPTION: T2
>> #+RESULTS: t2
>> #+END_EXAMPLE
>>
>
> This is not a latex issue per se. If you evaluate t2 with
>
>   `org-babel-execute-maybe'
>
> the same thing will happen.
>
> org-babel-execute:python does its own formatting. #+CALL: OTOH passes
> the results to babel.
>
> The workaround is to use
>
>   #+CALL: t1() :colnames yes
>
> HTH,
>
> Chuck
>
>
>