From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: cesar mena Subject: Re: please read: bug when marking tasks done Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:43:24 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87d0paprs6.fsf@gnu.org> <87wonhcpnj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <871s5o8pgf.fsf@gnu.org> <87muobcur7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87woneykuc.fsf@gnu.org> <87y37tzbrd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87muo88up0.fsf@gnu.org> <87y37qxgn8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87pnt2neeg.fsf@gnu.org> <87bm4kxqhn.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000015e0cd057f81dec7" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48875) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjS1F-0002v5-Fo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:56:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjRol-0007zr-5o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:44:00 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::229]:33607) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gjRol-0007zJ-0g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:43:59 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-x229.google.com with SMTP id c206so2664380oib.0 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 08:43:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87bm4kxqhn.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: cesar mena , emacs-orgmode , Leo Gaspard --00000000000015e0cd057f81dec7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" hello, On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 3:16 PM Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > cesar mena writes: > > > i'm ok going with the verbatim syntax - rescheduled lines will now look > > like (w/o the double quotes?): > > > > - Rescheduled from =[2019-02-05 Tue .1m]= on [2018-09-29 Sat 18:50] > > Thinking about it, another possibility is to add a variable, e.g., > `org-repeat-inactive-timestamps', letting the user choose what to do > with inactive time stamps. I think it would default to nil. > > This would be a more conservative solution; however, this would > contradict releases notes for Org 9.2. > > WDYT? > > this works of course and it doesn't affect current workflows while allowing for inactive repeating timestamps. the caveat would be that in the case of repeating timestamps, setting both `org-log-into-drawer' and `org-repeat-inactive-timestamps' to a true value will overwrite "Rescheduling" entries from the :LOGBOOK:. in some limited sense the two are incompatible (which would require the verbatim syntax). with that understanding, and the fact that repeating inactive timestamps is a new "feature" my vote is for `org-repeat-inactive-timestamps'. this leaves room down the road, should the need arise, for verbatim syntax in log entries. regards, -cm --00000000000015e0cd057f81dec7 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
hello,

On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 3:16 PM Nicolas G= oaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr= > wrote:
= Hello,

cesar mena <ce= sar.mena@gmail.com> writes:

> i'm ok going with the verbatim syntax - rescheduled lines will now= look
> like (w/o the double quotes?):
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0- Rescheduled from =3D[2019-02-05 Tue .1m]=3D on [2018-09-= 29 Sat 18:50]

Thinking about it, another possibility is to add a variable, e.g.,
`org-repeat-inactive-timestamps', letting the user choose what to do with inactive time stamps. I think it would default to nil.

This would be a more conservative solution; however, this would
contradict releases notes for Org 9.2.

WDYT?


this works of cours= e and it doesn't affect current workflows while allowing for inactive r= epeating timestamps.

the cavea= t would be that in the case of repeating timestamps, setting both `org-log-= into-drawer' and `org-repeat-inactive-timestamps' to a true value w= ill overwrite "Rescheduling" entries from the :LOGBOOK:.=C2=A0 in= some limited sense the two are incompatible (which would require the verba= tim syntax).

with that underst= anding, and the fact that repeating inactive timestamps is a new "feat= ure" my vote is for `org-repeat-inactive-timestamps'.=C2=A0 this l= eaves room down the road, should the need arise, for verbatim syntax in log= entries.

regards,
-cm


=C2=A0




--00000000000015e0cd057f81dec7--