* inconsistency with :eval yes in orgmode.org and gnu.org manuals for org 9.6, 9.5?
@ 2023-02-26 14:19 Dan Drake
2023-02-27 17:05 ` Ihor Radchenko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Drake @ 2023-02-26 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 951 bytes --]
The online manuals for 16.5 Evaluating Code Blocks seem inconsistent and
include a header argument that seems to no longer be respected.
https://orgmode.org/manual/Evaluating-Code-Blocks.html, for version 9.6,
right now says you can specify a header argument ":eval yes" on source code
blocks to bypass confirmation.
However, neither
https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/org/Evaluating-Code-Blocks.html
and
https://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/emacs/manual/html_node/org/Evaluating-Code-Blocks.html
mention that. They are both for version 9.5.
It seems like ":eval yes" was removed some time ago -- see
https://emacs.stackexchange.com/a/3570/19526.
Did that get re-added? It seems like it was replaced by the
org-confirm-babel-evaluate mechanism --
https://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/emacs/manual/html_node/org/Code-Evaluation-Security.html.
Just curious/confused. Thanks!
Dan
--
Ceci n'est pas une .signature.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1750 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: inconsistency with :eval yes in orgmode.org and gnu.org manuals for org 9.6, 9.5?
2023-02-26 14:19 inconsistency with :eval yes in orgmode.org and gnu.org manuals for org 9.6, 9.5? Dan Drake
@ 2023-02-27 17:05 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-28 10:38 ` Ihor Radchenko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ihor Radchenko @ 2023-02-27 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Drake; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 624 bytes --]
Dan Drake <dan.drake@gmail.com> writes:
> It seems like ":eval yes" was removed some time ago -- see
> https://emacs.stackexchange.com/a/3570/19526.
>
> Did that get re-added? It seems like it was replaced by the
> org-confirm-babel-evaluate mechanism --
> https://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/emacs/manual/html_node/org/Code-Evaluation-Security.html.
It did not really get removed.
But its meaning indeed changed slightly, despite what the current manual
says.
:eval yes evaluates the code blocks, but not unconditionally. It still
obeys org-confirm-babel-evaluate.
Does the attached patch clarify the situation?
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-org-manual-Clarify-that-eval-yes-obeys-org-confirm-b.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1054 bytes --]
From 3867672d6b38b3c0ccba0b5da8e4a3adb7f111b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <3867672d6b38b3c0ccba0b5da8e4a3adb7f111b1.1677517512.git.yantar92@posteo.net>
From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 20:02:50 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] org-manual: Clarify that :eval yes obeys
`org-confirm-babel-evaluate'
* doc/org-manual.org (Limit code block evaluation): Clarify :eval yes
value.
Reported-by: Dan Drake <dan.drake@gmail.com>
Link: https://orgmode.org/list/CAKqbAeFRGDzQQQkXHKvDPtgM7NYybWgxpJj3yoRKnuD2bSwyVw@mail.gmail.com
---
doc/org-manual.org | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/org-manual.org b/doc/org-manual.org
index 6a625b42a..1c97d6aa8 100644
--- a/doc/org-manual.org
+++ b/doc/org-manual.org
@@ -18123,7 +18123,8 @@ *** Limit code block evaluation
- =yes= ::
- Org always evaluates the source code without asking permission.
+ Org evaluates the source code, possibly asking permission according
+ to ~org-confirm-babel-evaluate~.
- =never= or =no= ::
--
2.39.1
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 224 bytes --]
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: inconsistency with :eval yes in orgmode.org and gnu.org manuals for org 9.6, 9.5?
2023-02-27 17:05 ` Ihor Radchenko
@ 2023-02-28 10:38 ` Ihor Radchenko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ihor Radchenko @ 2023-02-28 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Drake; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:
> Subject: [PATCH] org-manual: Clarify that :eval yes obeys
> `org-confirm-babel-evaluate'
>
> * doc/org-manual.org (Limit code block evaluation): Clarify :eval yes
> value.
Applied, onto bugfix.
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?h=bugfix&id=911d6a1027784ab081cb41b40c08826e62066c73
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-02-28 10:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-02-26 14:19 inconsistency with :eval yes in orgmode.org and gnu.org manuals for org 9.6, 9.5? Dan Drake
2023-02-27 17:05 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-28 10:38 ` Ihor Radchenko
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).