Hi Bastien,<div><br></div><div>sorry for the late reply.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Bastien <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:bzg@altern.org" target="_blank">bzg@altern.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">Hi Henning,<br>
<br>
Henning Weiss &lt;<a href="mailto:hdweiss@gmail.com">hdweiss@gmail.com</a>&gt; writes:<br>
<br>
</div><div class="im">&gt; I was wondering why this patch was reversed in master.<br>
<br>
</div>I think the line didn&#39;t change since 4a49e40d but I might be wrong.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
&gt; An updated version of the patch is attached, and a discussion of what<br>
&gt; it does is below.<br>
<br>
</div>Looks like the &quot;updated&quot; version is the same than the one you sent<br>
first: <a href="http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2012-01/msg00938.html" target="_blank">http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2012-01/msg00938.html</a><br>
<br>
... and there is an updated one in the same thread:<br>
<a href="http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2012-01/msg01073.html" target="_blank">http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2012-01/msg01073.html</a><br>
<br>
Which one should I apply?<br>
<br>
Could you add a commit message with an Emacs changelog to your patch?</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I have attached a better version of the patch instead.</div></div><br></div><div>Henning</div>