Marcin Borkowski <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl> writes:

> On 2015-04-06, at 13:40, Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> wrote:
>
>> Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@panix.com> writes:
>>
>>> http://www.adobe.com/accessibility/products.html
>>> is a good place to start.
>>
>> It's a list of a bunch of software packages of which most are not (i) free
>> in any meaning of the word; and (ii) supported on GNU/Linux.
>
> So what?  IIUC, the OP wants to have something similar using Emacs and
> (maybe) free (in a usual sense, or in FSF sense) software.  Isn't it
> a valid request?

Of course it is, but OP is referring to features of some software that I
don't have access to, so how am I supposed to make sense of it?  I'm not
going to (i) install a new OS; and (ii) buy/torrent software to understand
and test a feature in named software.

If there's a standard I'm eager to hear about it.