From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Allen Li <vianchielfaura@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [IMPORTANT] Server migration: please update your git
 repositories before 31/12/2017
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2017 02:39:34 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJr1M6deVuVqxy8QjLcHoTtJHUFkJVZrJQKCBeEVfA_AV3=rFQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87d12yojyn.fsf@bzg.fr> <p253ib$5c2$1@blaine.gmane.org>
	<87r2rd67q6.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38125)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <vianchielfaura@gmail.com>) id 1eVEYG-0004vt-7L
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 05:39:41 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <vianchielfaura@gmail.com>) id 1eVEYF-0004xH-Ja
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 05:39:40 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87r2rd67q6.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Bastien Guerry <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 4:26 AM, Bastien Guerry <bzg@gnu.org> wrote:
> Hi Achim,
>
> Achim Gratz <Stromeko@Nexgo.DE> writes:
>
>> And if you'd read through the entirety of the Register article you
>> linked to you'd find that presumably any existing OSS hosting would
>> continue to be free, so why exactly does Org need to migrate?
>
> I didn't decide to migrate the server based on reading this article
> but based on email exchanges with Jason.
>
> Migrating to a new vultr instance was easier than trying to upgrade
> the rackspace hosting service and the vultr pricing is better.

I'm not sure I understand.  According to the referenced news article,
Rackspace will continue to service existing FOSS projects (i.e., Org)
for free.  Shouldn't Rackspace's free pricing be better than vultr's
$5 hosting?