From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Allen Li <vianchielfaura@gmail.com>
Subject: Changing behavior of org-insert-todo-heading-respect-content
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 14:50:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJr1M6d=0QTyNPWaBwbnciq2fM4mCYBRXOeR_hR-vA4Tj1kN5A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51826)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <vianchielfaura@gmail.com>) id 1e3qnu-00045x-4h
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 17:50:38 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <vianchielfaura@gmail.com>) id 1e3qnt-0008Id-5a
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 17:50:38 -0400
Received: from mail-qk0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233]:49753)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <vianchielfaura@gmail.com>)
	id 1e3qnt-0008I8-0p
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 17:50:37 -0400
Received: by mail-qk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id q83so7618704qke.6
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 14:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Regarding the behavior of org-insert-todo-heading-respect-content,
bound to C-S-return, consider the following .org file:

* TODO some task
** WAITING other task

If point is on the TODO line, pressing C-S-return yields

* TODO some task
** WAITING other task
* WAITING

When I use C-S-return, I always desire

* TODO some task
** WAITING other task
* TODO

Making C-S-return do this would break backward compatibility, but I
think this behavior is more intuitive.  Thoughts?