From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: org-todo does not take into account quasi-todo-keywords
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:18:08 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJcAo8vrbajHcqUSN6eVNACG69=QhWazGPrjZme6R3sY8R+qPQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJcAo8t0n35wLqKB-sDovQX-RMPAQPq2CUQ+BjNDBnZWcMtk5g@mail.gmail.com>
	<87wqw9u0cj.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52629)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1TmxcL-0003j8-1Z
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 21:18:15 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1TmxcI-0000kX-Cl
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 21:18:12 -0500
Received: from mail-la0-f43.google.com ([209.85.215.43]:44990)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samologist@gmail.com>) id 1TmxcI-0000kE-44
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 21:18:10 -0500
Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id z14so8000516lag.30
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 18:18:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87wqw9u0cj.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On 12/22/12, Bastien <bzg@altern.org> wrote:
> This is now fixed, thanks.

Thanks, Bastien.

> I wonder what behavior is preferrable in this case: just ignore the
> COMMENT string (which is now what Org does) or to delete it -- which
> is what a user might expect when _updating_ a TODO state.
>
> What do you think?

I prefer skipping here for orthogonality, so all is well.

Samuel

-- 
The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com

The disease DOES progress.  MANY people have died from it.  ANYBODY
can get it.  There is no hope without action.