emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
To: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>
Cc: "Tory S. Anderson" <webdev@toryanderson.com>,
	orgmode list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: is it possible to choose a completion engine?
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 18:26:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJcAo8vj7JxCSEb=cuRj_zVyHNM2qhJPXf+e0Wbu2g9=cxeKWw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87jzx0o6sw.fsf@localhost>

i guess menu selection is a kind of completion and frameworks coud be
used also.  a big thing for me that works with ido and ido-hacks and
ido-clever-match is olpath completion for refile-goto and refile.


On 5/22/23, Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> wrote:
> webdev@toryanderson.com (Tory S. Anderson) writes:
>
>> Org currently stands out from my workflow because it does completions its
>> own way, with lists and number/letter keys. It would be nice if I could
>> instead have the benefit of vertico, or helm, or whatever else instead.
>> Org would even benefit from marginalia and embark in some cases. Is there
>> an easy variable I'm missing to make org use completing-reads instead of
>> the indexing thing it does?
>
> This is because you customized your tags/todo keywords to have a quick
> key binding to set. By default, Org uses custom "fast" interface for
> completion in such cases. You can either remove the bindings to
> explicitly set `org-use-fast-tag-selection' and/or
> `org-use-fast-todo-selection' to nil.
>
> --
> Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
> Org mode contributor,
> Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
> Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
> or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
>
>


-- 
The Kafka Pandemic

A blog about science, health, human rights, and misopathy:
https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com


  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-23  1:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-20 21:08 is it possible to choose a completion engine? Tory S. Anderson
2023-05-22 13:05 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-05-23  1:26   ` Samuel Wales [this message]
2023-05-23 14:41     ` Tory S. Anderson
2023-05-24  0:03       ` Samuel Wales
2023-05-23 18:45   ` Tory S. Anderson
2023-05-24 10:06     ` Ihor Radchenko
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-05-22  6:13 Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJcAo8vj7JxCSEb=cuRj_zVyHNM2qhJPXf+e0Wbu2g9=cxeKWw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=samologist@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=webdev@toryanderson.com \
    --cc=yantar92@posteo.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).