From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Wales Subject: org-capture changes the buffer ring in a confusing way Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:44:07 -0700 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44203) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VBGO5-0002zO-6k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 23:44:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VBGO0-0006eE-4P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 23:44:13 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]:62649) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VBGNz-0006e1-UY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 23:44:08 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id q59so3097618wes.13 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:44:07 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org When I use capture, the buffer ring ordering changes from what it was before the capture. It even changes when I cancel the capture. Is there a way to keep it exactly as it was in all cases? What I expected was that previous-buffer would be the same before and after and that next-buffer would be the same before and after. [In other words, that capture + capture finalizing would not change anything. The philosophy of capture, to my understanding, is that capture is intended to allow you to take a note with minimum distraction.] What I tried was org-capture. What I noticed was that the buffer ring ordering had changed. I have previous-buffer and next-buffer set to function keys, and I find them extremely useful. But when the buffer ring ordering changes, I get confused. So capture confuses me. Also, it seems to always split the window. Is there a way to fix that that is better than my current method of deleting other windows in the hook? I always require a single window. Thanks. Samuel -- The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com The disease DOES progress. MANY people have died from it. ANYBODY can get it. Denmark: free Karina Hansen NOW.