From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Wales Subject: another auto-fill bug Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 10:04:01 -0700 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33006) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPFzU-0008Cz-K9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:04:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPFzP-0006Ay-Pw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:04:08 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com ([209.85.217.169]:53893) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPFzP-0006Aa-8x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:04:03 -0400 Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id k6so555403lbo.0 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 10:04:01 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org If you press SPC after this with the appropriate fill-columun setup, Org will incorrectly comment the next line. === # It's not as if bad guys always aim # for the loss of life per se. They often just consider the # loss of life less important than their real goal. I won't go into the details, because I don't use the term. === Just out of curiosity, what would be the incorrect behavior that would result if Org used Emacs standard filling and auto-filling instead of its own? Thanks. Samuel -- The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com