From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Wales Subject: Re: Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 22:48:53 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87wqg0gawq.fsf@gmail.com> <87lhwgettp.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87bnxbg02x.fsf@gmail.com> <87ha73dnxe.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87zjku41nq.fsf@gmail.com> <878usdemuv.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87eh25d22d.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41498) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WOKzH-0004EL-TL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 01:48:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WOKzG-0005ak-UP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 01:48:55 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]:34850) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WOKzG-0005ae-O1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 01:48:54 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hr14so4864853wib.15 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 22:48:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87eh25d22d.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Schulte Cc: Andreas Leha , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > No. This has been raised previously and there was a consensus that it > is often desirable for code in a COMMENT section to be evaluated on > export. Personally I often stuff code blocks into COMMENT sections > which I want run as part of my publishing process (e.g., to create > resources used in the exported document). i won't go against consensus, but to me the expectation is that it acts just like commented lines. for your use case, could you use a section marked noexport or org-export-with-tasks? i would use the latter. if this has been raised before, please ignore.