From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Wales Subject: Re: %( in capture template Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:45:27 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87bmveo58e.fsf@gmail.com> <87inpmug8c.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87r32uzgzk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57658) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cl644-0003JE-5S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 22:45:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cl643-0002Yv-79 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 22:45:32 -0500 Received: from mail-ua0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c08::232]:33126) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cl643-0002Y5-18 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 22:45:31 -0500 Received: by mail-ua0-x232.google.com with SMTP id u30so61403792uau.0 for ; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 19:45:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2/19/17, Samuel Wales wrote: > ***** x > link > https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/h/rfjkj7op114w/?&th=15a580ccf5cb9d34&v=c > description Gmail - %( in capture template > region > %(alpha-org-protocol-string > "https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/h/rfjkj7op114w/?&th=15a580ccf5cb9d34&v=c" > "Gmail - %( in capture template" "> with the new org maint code, i > still occasionally get the literal string. > %(alpha-org-protocol-string > "https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/h/rfjkj7op114w/?&th=15a580ccf5cb9d34&v=c" > "Gmail - %( in capture template" "> > %(alpha-org-protocol-string > "https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/h/rfjkj7op114w/?&th=15a580ccf5cb9d34&v=c" > "Gmail - %( in capture template" "> it occurs when the region spans a > blank line. intuitively, does this sound like user error, or a bug?