emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* should a BIBLIOGRAPHY keyword supercede org-cite-global-bibliography?
@ 2021-07-19 16:07 John Kitchin
  2021-07-19 16:18 ` Bruce D'Arcus
  2021-07-20  0:01 ` Vikas Rawal
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: John Kitchin @ 2021-07-19 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: org-mode-email

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 613 bytes --]

The org-cite-list-bibliography-files function in oc.el returns a
combination of file-local files and the bibfiles defined
in org-cite-global-bibliography.

It seems like that should not be the case, i.e. if you define BIBLIOGRAPHY
keywords it means you do not want to use the ones
in org-cite-global-bibliography. Is there a scenario where the union of
those makes sense?

John

-----------------------------------
Professor John Kitchin (he/him/his)
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
@johnkitchin
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 949 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* should a BIBLIOGRAPHY keyword supercede org-cite-global-bibliography?
@ 2021-07-19 17:29 CHARPENTIER Emmanuel via General discussions about Org-mode.
  2021-07-19 17:40 ` Bruce D'Arcus
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: CHARPENTIER Emmanuel via General discussions about Org-mode. @ 2021-07-19 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bdarcus@gmail.com, jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu; +Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

> It seems like that should not be the case, i.e. if you define
> BIBLIOGRAPHY keywords it means you do not want to use the ones in 
> org-cite-global-bibliography. Is there a scenario where the union of 
> those makes sense?

Yes indeed: you may have
  - A library for background issues (e. g. methodology)
  - A (or several) subject matter-specific library (e. g. a 
    subdiscipline, a method, etc...)
  - A library specific to the question you are discussing (e. g. 
    results of a bibliographic search specific to your question).

The first one is a perfect target for org-cite-global-bibliography. The
last one is of course a target for #+BIBLIOGRAPHY ; I'd tend to let the
subject matter library as a file-specific #+BIBLIOGRAPHY (my subject
matters tend to vary...), but this depends on your field.

You may also think of this typology as books, reviews and research
papers respectively...

HTH,

--
Emmanuel Charpentier


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-07-20  8:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-07-19 16:07 should a BIBLIOGRAPHY keyword supercede org-cite-global-bibliography? John Kitchin
2021-07-19 16:18 ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-07-20  0:01 ` Vikas Rawal
2021-07-20  0:52   ` Thomas S. Dye
2021-07-20  1:42     ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-07-20  8:03     ` Eric S Fraga
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-07-19 17:29 CHARPENTIER Emmanuel via General discussions about Org-mode.
2021-07-19 17:40 ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-07-19 17:54   ` John Kitchin
2021-07-19 18:06     ` Bruce D'Arcus
2021-07-19 18:07     ` CHARPENTIER Emmanuel via General discussions about Org-mode.

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).