From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Kitchin Subject: Re: org-preview-latex-fragment for @@latex:stuff@@? Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 05:57:35 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87wpta17ey.fsf@gmx.us> <87wpt7zs98.fsf@delle7240.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bea41f291f37a0525473536 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35870) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1BI1-00083g-F6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 05:57:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1BI0-0002p6-DD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 05:57:37 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]:35952) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1BI0-0002oz-5z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 05:57:36 -0500 Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so133043904wmw.1 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 02:57:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87wpt7zs98.fsf@delle7240.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: John Kitchin , "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" --047d7bea41f291f37a0525473536 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 It can be, but a more typical one I use is \ce{Cu_{1-x}Pd_{x}} and that has to be wrapped in @@latex:...@@. John ----------------------------------- Professor John Kitchin Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-268-7803 @johnkitchin http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote: > On Monday, 23 Nov 2015 at 14:42, John Kitchin wrote: > > True enough! I wasn't thinking very large when I had the question in > > mind! I end up with a lot of chemical formulas like this > > @@latex:\ce{H_{2}O}@@ in my writing because the {} inside the {} makes > > OT but just wondering: shouldn't this be @@latex:\ce{H2O}@@? And this > would work just fine without the @@ directive for LaTeX export at least. > > -- > : Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 24.5.1, Org release_8.3.2-215-gb4af3f > --047d7bea41f291f37a0525473536 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It can be, but a more typical one I use is \ce{Cu_{1-x}Pd_= {x}} and that has to be wrapped in @@latex:...@@.

John

-----------------------------------Professor John Kitchin=C2=A0
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemic= al Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412= -268-7803

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Eric S Frag= a <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
On Monday, 23 Nov 2015 at 14:42, John Kitchin wrote: > True enough! I wasn't thinking very large when I had the question = in
> mind! I end up with a lot of chemical formulas like this
> @@latex:\ce{H_{2}O}@@=C2=A0 in my writing because the {} inside the {}= makes

OT but just wondering: shouldn't this be @@latex:\ce{H2O}@@?=C2= =A0 And this
would work just fine without the @@ directive for LaTeX export at least.
--
: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 24.5.1, Org release_8.3.2-215-gb4af3f

--047d7bea41f291f37a0525473536--