Re: org-cite styles don't allow * in them

[John Kitchin <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1292 bytes --]

I am also not a fan of using Unicode here and prefer a simple ascii
asterisk. That works fine for me so far, but I am not a heavy user of bold
markup and citations.

As I mentioned there is the same problem for links, and in the last 10
years I can’t recall an issue being reported with bold.

On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 4:41 AM Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com> wrote:

> "Bruce D'Arcus" <bdarcus@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> A less awkward solution (IMO) would be to use an entity like ⋆.  It is
> >> straightforward to add that to the org-element-citation-prefix-re. Then
> I
> >> see something like this.
> >
> > So Ihor, is there any problem with John's proposed change here?
>
> I am not a big fan of using unicode characters, but otherwise I have no
> objections and no better ideas (except a general desire to solve similar
> parser issues more generally).
>
> However, I am not org-cite's maintainer. So, I would prefer to hear from
> Nicolas before implementing anything myself.
>
> Best,
> Ihor
>
-- 
John

-----------------------------------
Professor John Kitchin (he/him/his)
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
@johnkitchin
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2045 bytes --]