issue indent src block?

issue indent src block?

[zimoun]

Dear,
(please CC me because I have not subscribed)


I have noted unexpected alignment with source blocks. For example:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
#+begin_src shell
0
#+end_src

* One

  #+begin_src shell
  1
  #+end_src

** Two

   #+begin_src shell
   2
   #+end_src
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

where the blocks are filled using the usual C-c '.

I was expecting that 0, 1 and 2 aligned with the 'b' of 'begin'.
And if I move them by hand and them hit C-x h and Tab, they are placed
again as in the example above.


Is this alignment expected?
Do I misconfigure something? Even if I reproduce the behaviour with "emacs -q".


Emacs 26.3 and Org 9.3.6 comes from Guix
de5200ada9932501dbe010990ed1acf7688846a6.


Thank you in advance for any comment.

All the best,
simon

Re: issue indent src block?

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:

> I have noted unexpected alignment with source blocks. For example:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> #+begin_src shell
> 0
> #+end_src
>
> * One
>
>   #+begin_src shell
>   1
>   #+end_src
>
> ** Two
>
>    #+begin_src shell
>    2
>    #+end_src
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> where the blocks are filled using the usual C-c '.
>
> I was expecting that 0, 1 and 2 aligned with the 'b' of 'begin'.
> And if I move them by hand and them hit C-x h and Tab, they are placed
> again as in the example above.

I cannot reproduce it. You may want to check if something is setting
`org-edit-src-content-indentation' to 0, e.g., .dir-locals.el or some
such.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

Re: issue indent src block?

[zimoun]

Hi Nicolas,

On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 18:12, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:

> I cannot reproduce it. You may want to check if something is setting
> `org-edit-src-content-indentation' to 0, e.g., .dir-locals.el or some
> such.

Thanks!
I have not found the culprit yet but hunt in progress... :-)

All the best,
simon