Thanks Bastien for all your work!

--Diego


On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 4:50 PM Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> here are the results of the survey, with *47* voters:
>
> - 26+2 : org-loop-over-headlines-in-active-region => t
> - 25+2 : org-agenda-loop-over-headlines-in-active-region => t
> - 28+3 : org-fontify-done-headline => t
> - 17+4 : org-hide-emphasis-markers => t
> - 10+6 : org-hide-macro-markers => t
> - 15+5 : org-refile-use-cache => t
> - 23+6 : org-special-ctrl-k => t
> - 20+6 : org-allow-promoting-top-level-subtree => t
> - 22+5 : Add org-tempo to org-modules
>
> I've changed the values of these options in master:
>
> - 35+2 : org-src-tab-acts-natively => t
> - 28+3 : org-fontify-done-headline => t
> - 26+2 : org-loop-over-headlines-in-active-region => t
> - 25+2 : org-agenda-loop-over-headlines-in-active-region => t
>
> I've *not* changed the values of these options:
>
> - 23+6 : org-special-ctrl-k => t
> - 22+5 : Add org-tempo to org-modules
> - 20+6 : org-allow-promoting-top-level-subtree => t
> - 17+4 : org-hide-emphasis-markers => t
> - 10+6 : org-hide-macro-markers => t
> - 15+5 : org-refile-use-cache => t
>
> The reason for not changing the default of org-special-ctrl-k is that
> 23 < 47/2.  Also, I think it was a mistake to propose this: even the
> org-special- prefix should have warned me.  The org-special-* options
> should be nil by default, and while org-special-ctrl-k may be useful,
> it is as useful as org-special-ctrl-a/e, which sticks to nil too.
>
> The reason for not adding org-tempo to org-modules is, on top of the
> poll being 22 < 47/2, that the current discussion on the list leaves
> room for improvements that may lead to move org-tempo from Org's core
> anyway.
>
> The reason for not changing the four other options is that they did
> not get enough votes.
>
> I've push the change for the three options in current master.
>
> Thanks again for participating to the poll and to the discussions!
>
> Best,
>
> --
>  Bastien
>
>