From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Diego Zamboni Subject: Re: Moving from Jekyll to Orgmode Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 13:38:37 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1524949519.21032.171.camel@gmail.com> <87o9hu7zz4.fsf@gmx.us> <1525682386.2021.37.camel@gmail.com> <87muxb6ra4.fsf@gmx.us> <1525851324.2021.59.camel@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000002f34c056bc458fa" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34321) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fGNQh-0001Vl-Vy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 May 2018 07:38:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fGNQd-0001b2-3w for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 May 2018 07:38:44 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]:37684) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fGNQc-0001Zw-TW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 May 2018 07:38:39 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id l1-v6so27222916wmb.2 for ; Wed, 09 May 2018 04:38:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1525851324.2021.59.camel@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: ST Cc: Org-mode , Rasmus --00000000000002f34c056bc458fa Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > > Is the difficulty to setup ox-publish the sole disadvantage vis. > ox-hugo/ox-jekyll/etc.? Is the functionality the same more_or_less? > > What ox-hugo devs/users have to say on this? I have never used ox-publish, but getting started with ox-hugo is really easy. I think the main difference might be that ox-hugo is tailored specifically for Hugo, which influences its expected directory structure, file output format, etc. Ox-publish might be more generic and customizable for arbitrary output formats. --Diego --00000000000002f34c056bc458fa Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Is the difficulty to setup ox-publish the sole disadvantage vis= .
ox-hugo/ox-jekyll/etc.? Is the functionality the same more_or_less?

What ox-hugo devs/users have to say on this?

I have never used ox-publish, but getting started with ox-hugo is really = easy. I think the main difference might be that ox-hugo is tailored specifi= cally for Hugo, which influences its expected directory structure, file out= put format, etc. Ox-publish might be more generic and customizable for arbi= trary output formats.

--Diego
--00000000000002f34c056bc458fa--